Thursday, February 26, 2009

In the hands of a potter God


Question: My husband and I were reading Romans 9. In v22, it speaks of some being created for destruction. Is this non-Christians or Pharaoh or Judas, etc who God puts in those positions to bring glory through their wickedness?
In order to answer this question properly we need to delve into the argument that Paul is mounting in Romans 9. Paul begins by expressing his deep anguish that many Jews have turned their backs on Jesus Christ. But this does not mean Israel has no place or that God has been unfaithful in anyway. To be a Jew does not automatically make you part of the people of God. He uses the example of Esau and Jacob, 'Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated' (v13). The call of God was never because of something we had done but his sovereign choice before the creation of the world. God will show mercy on whom he wishes in order that there will never be a reason for us to boast and no human will or effort will ever thwart or distract from his purposes. But if this is true, how can humans be blamed for anything? It is the context of this question that v20-23 fall.
Here is Rom 9:20-23 (from the ESV) in case you don't have it handy.
But who are you, O man, to answer back to God? Will what is molded say to its molder, "Why have you made me like this?" 21 Has the potter no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for honored use and another for dishonorable use? 22 What if God, desiring to show his wrath and to make known his power, has endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, 23 in order to make known the riches of his glory for vessels of mercy, which he has prepared beforehand for glory-
Paul tells us quite clearly that human beings have no right to question the sovereignty of God. Like the potter has authority over the clay so to God has authority over us. Indeed God has even ordained some to be vessels of destruction so that his glory may be made known. So, is this all non-Christians? Or just a select few?
A couple of things to note about the 'vessels of destruction'. Firstly, he has endured them with much patience. Secondly, unless you believe in annihilationism (which I don't) then the destruction of here is about 'eternal exclusion'. God doesn't make something just to destroy it. And, thirdly, God prepares them for destruction (it is a passive verb) they don't prepare themselves. In light of this I think these vessels of wrath are the unresponsive Jews.
But it is also true to say that Paul is picking up on v17
For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, "For this very purpose I have raised you up, that I might show my power in you, and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth." 18 So then he has mercy on whomever he wills, and he hardens whomever he wills.
Yes, it is Pharaoh, it is Judas and it is the unresponsiveness of the Jews and their may be some non-Christians who particularly fit this case. But in all of this we need to remember it is God's sovereign choice and we are nothing but clay.
That he chooses some at all shows his mercy and his love.

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Made for destruction?


Question: Why did Jesus pick Judas as a disciple knowing how he would end up? It seems like all the other disciples went into ministry until death.
There a couple of things to say in response to this question that draw out the tension.
Firstly, we should not doubt the sincerity of the call of the Lord Jesus. Jesus views him as a follower and a disciple. You see this in Mark 3: 13-20 as Jesus names his 12 disciples. So, we can say that yes Jesus did pick Judas, he called him to follow him.
Secondly, Judas fell from apostleship. He was lost because he was never saved. Some people draw attention to the fact he never called Jesus Lord only 'Rabbi' (Matt 26:25). And so he leaves the gospel story a doomed and damned man as that is what he chose and God confirmed him in that dreadful choice. And we can also say then, that even though he was called he did not follow because he chose not to.
Both of these things need to be held even though they feel contradictory!
Does that make the call of Jesus in some way ineffective? I keep having Hebrews run around in the back of my head and the warnings it lays down for Christian people. Ch 6 especially talks about those who have 'been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, who have shared in the Holy Spirit, who have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of this coming age'. Surely these people are Christians yet it talks about them falling away. So, we know that it is not once a Christian always a Christian.
But this doesn't rob us of assurance either. Hebrew 6: 19
We have this hope as an anchor for the soul, firm and secure.
Interestingly, this verse comes straight after the writer talking about falling away. We can have assurance of our salvation. We can confidently say that we are chosen by God if we confess that Jesus Christ is LORD. But to begin the race is good to finish the race is even better and only those who are chosen will finish. Those chosen will continue to heed the warnings of Scripture to love God and obey him.
The exhortation in Hebrews 6 is that,
'we want each of you to show this same diligence to the very end, in order to make your hope sure'.
We can only go on what people tell us, we need as JC ryle (I think) said, gracious assumption.

Can we stop saying 'Catholic'

Question: Why do we say we believe in the Catholic church during the Apostle's Creed?

For those not versed in the Apostle's Creed
It says;
I believe in the Holy Spirit;
The holy catholic church;

This is a common question. When we say the word Catholic we don't mean Roman Catholic.
But rather it just means universal. So, when we say it in the Creed then we are saying that we believe in the universal church of Jesus Christ.
Unfortunately people today say Catholic to refer to the Roman Catholic church these days and so it becomes confusing for people. My personal opinion is rather than fight to reclaim the word Catholic we should change it to say:
I believe in the Holy Spirit;
The holy universal church.

Out with the old and in with the new


Yes, yes I know this blog has been severely neglected for the last 10months. Partly it lacked purpose. Thanks to Mr Purpose himself, Tom!
BUT I have been thinking about how to revamp it in a helpful way.
And it starts tonight!!!
Part of what we do at Sunday at 6 (http://www.norwestanglican.org.au/) is fill in a communication card. And I encourage people to write questions they have from the talk or questions about things they have been reading either from the Bible or from a Christian book.
So, when people write a question - I will answer their question/s here.
This is my plan and it is my plan to stick to my new plan ... it's not an evil plan to take over the world but maybe, just maybe......